Diagnostic Usage of Low Dose CT in Solitary Pulmonary Nodule Follow Up in Daily Practice

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Ikidag, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.author Uyar, Meral
dc.contributor.author Gündogdu, Nevhiz
dc.contributor.author Cuce, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.author Sanli, Maruf
dc.contributor.author Aydin, Neriman
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-05T10:44:25Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-05T10:44:25Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.issn 1573-4056
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/ 10.2174/1573405613666170407160201 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://openaccess.sanko.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12527/331
dc.description.abstract Purpose: Numbers of computed tomography (CT) examinations are increasing, so does the number of patients exposed to ionizing radiation. Our aim was to reveal the current usage of low dose CT protocols in pulmonary nodule follow up in Gaziantep, Turkey, and what is more important to create awareness to the issue. Materials and Methods: A survey was conducted with specialists of chest diseases, thoracic surgeons and radiologists, regarding pulmonary nodule follow-up. At the end of the interview, brief information was given to the participants about the benefits of low dose CT. Results: Among 81 participants, 16 of the 39 radiologists (41.02%) stated that their CT scanners had a previously established low dose chest CT protocols by vendors, while 14 (35.89%) responded that they did not have any and 9 (23.07%) stated they did not know if they had. Twenty nine (74.35%) of the radiologists answered that they have not used the low dose protocols in nodule follow up before. Ninety five percent of clinicians were following a nodule 2 years before they excluded patients from follow up. Only 10 clinicians (23.8%) stated that they have requested low dose chest CT before, while remaining 32 (76.2%) answered they did not ever. Requested mean CT examination numbers during a follow up (except initial CT) were 5.87 +/- 2.01, and 6.42 +/- 2.15 for pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons, respectively (p=0.437). Conclusion: Follow up strategies of clinicians are consisted with recent literature knowledge, but low dose CT protocols in nodule follow up have not gained enough recognition in our city, yet. Physicians must be enlightened, and steps must be taken to generalize the use of low dose CT, especially in public hospitals, where vast majority of CT examinations are performed. en_US
dc.language.iso English en_US
dc.publisher BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD, EXECUTIVE STE Y-2, PO BOX 7917, SAIF ZONE, 1200 BR SHARJAH, U ARAB EMIRATES en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Computed tomography en_US
dc.subject ionizing radiation en_US
dc.subject pulmonary nodule en_US
dc.subject chest diseases en_US
dc.subject thoracic surgeons en_US
dc.subject radiologist en_US
dc.title Diagnostic Usage of Low Dose CT in Solitary Pulmonary Nodule Follow Up in Daily Practice en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.journal CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS en_US
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.startpage 392 en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 396 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 13 en_US
dc.identifier.wos 000415813000004 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.2174/1573405613666170407160201 en_US
dc.contributor.sankoauthor Mehmet Ali İkidağ en_US
dc.contributor.sankoauthor Mehmet Ali Cüce en_US
dc.contributor.sankoauthor Meral Uyar en_US
dc.contributor.sankoauthor Nevhiz Gündoğdu en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Dosyalar Boyut Biçim Göster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

Gazimuhtar Paşa Bulvarı
No:36
27090
Şehitkamil / GAZİANTEP